pinger@pinger $ ping pinger.comsats.edu.pk PING pinger.comsats.edu.pk (202.83.169.113) 56(84) bytes of data. From rwp44.pie.net.pk (202.125.159.209) icmp_seq=0 Time to live exceeded From rwp44.pie.net.pk (202.125.159.209) icmp_seq=1 Time to live exceeded --- pinger.comsats.edu.pk ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 0 received, +2 errors, 100% packet loss, time 1013ms , pipe 2
pinger@pinger $ traceroute pinger.comsats.edu.pk traceroute to pinger.comsats.edu.pk (202.83.169.113), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets 1 rtr-iepm-test (134.79.243.1) 0.770 ms 0.402 ms 0.476 ms 2 rtr-core1-p2p-iepm (134.79.252.5) 0.491 ms 0.450 ms 0.484 ms 3 rtr-dmz1-ger (134.79.135.15) 0.487 ms 0.453 ms 0.487 ms 4 slac-rt4.es.net (192.68.191.146) 0.486 ms 0.455 ms 0.485 ms 5 slacmr1-slacrt4.es.net (134.55.209.93) 1.004 ms 0.434 ms 0.482 ms 6 snv2mr1-slacmr1.es.net (134.55.217.2) 2.489 ms 120.952 ms 1.900 ms 7 snv2sdn1-snv2mr1.es.net (134.55.207.37) 0.964 ms 1.333 ms 0.948 ms 8 snvrt1-snv2sdn1.es.net (134.55.221.37) 0.970 ms 0.979 ms 1.074 ms 9 188.ATM1-0.BR2.SJC1.ALTER.NET (204.255.174.49) 1.863 ms 2.012 ms 1.428 ms 10 154.ATM3-0.XR1.SJC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.51.174) 1.965 ms 1.981 ms 2.428 ms 11 0.so-0-0-0.XL1.SJC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.55.114) 1.996 ms 2.493 ms 2.444 ms 12 0.so-1-1-0.XT1.NYC8.ALTER.NET (152.63.21.101) 72.992 ms 72.960 ms 72.933 ms 13 0.so-3-0-0.XR1.NYC8.ALTER.NET (152.63.19.30) 72.960 ms 72.966 ms 93.427 ms 14 183.ATM6-0.IG3.NYC8.ALTER.NET (152.63.26.49) 72.933 ms 72.977 ms 73.444 ms 15 pctl-gw.customer.alter.net (208.192.182.34) 296.934 ms 296.430 ms 296.435 ms 16 pos1-2.rwp44gsrc2.pie.net.pk (202.125.159.23) 316.434 ms 316.290 ms 316.012 ms MPLS Label=567 CoS=7 TTL=1 S=0 17 rwp44.pie.net.pk (202.125.159.210) 391.892 ms 408.267 ms 458.021 ms MPLS Label=591 CoS=7 TTL=1 S=0 18 rwp44.pie.net.pk (202.125.159.209) 319.844 ms 318.206 ms 315.996 ms 19 rwp44.pie.net.pk (202.125.159.210) 315.890 ms 315.771 ms 317.949 ms MPLS Label=591 CoS=7 TTL=1 S=0 20 rwp44.pie.net.pk (202.125.159.209) 316.435 ms 316.130 ms 316.097 ms 21 rwp44.pie.net.pk (202.125.159.210) 316.878 ms 320.811 ms 315.959 ms MPLS Label=591 CoS=7 TTL=1 S=0 22 rwp44.pie.net.pk (202.125.159.209) 316.946 ms 316.285 ms 315.967 ms 23 rwp44.pie.net.pk (202.125.159.210) 316.428 ms 316.304 ms 332.451 ms MPLS Label=591 CoS=7 TTL=1 S=0 24 rwp44.pie.net.pk (202.125.159.209) 316.469 ms 316.291 ms 316.453 ms 25 rwp44.pie.net.pk (202.125.159.210) 316.447 ms 316.328 ms 316.479 ms MPLS Label=591 CoS=7 TTL=1 S=0 26 rwp44.pie.net.pk (202.125.159.209) 337.333 ms 316.372 ms 315.948 ms 27 rwp44.pie.net.pk (202.125.159.210) 316.393 ms 316.309 ms 320.434 ms MPLS Label=591 CoS=7 TTL=1 S=0 28 rwp44.pie.net.pk (202.125.159.209) 316.443 ms 337.849 ms 316.434 ms 29 rwp44.pie.net.pk (202.125.159.210) 319.456 ms 316.331 ms 316.451 ms MPLS Label=591 CoS=7 TTL=1 S=0 30 rwp44.pie.net.pk (202.125.159.209) 316.907 ms 316.829 ms 324.821 ms
Further investigation of the MX records showed that the MX server for pie.net.pk was asher.pknic.net.pk using dig:
; <<>> DiG 8.4 <<>> pie.net.pk MX ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch no-nibble2 ;; got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 5926 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUERY SECTION: ;; pie.net.pk, type = MX, class = IN ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: pk. 3H IN SOA ns.pknic.net.pk. ashar.pknic.net.pk. ( 1137368302 ; serial 4H ; refresh 2H ; retry 1w3d ; expiry 6H ) ; minimum ;; Total query time: 50 msec ;; FROM: pinger to SERVER: 134.79.18.45 ;; WHEN: Sun Jul 8 18:23:20 2007 ;; MSG SIZE sent: 28 rcvd: 79However the MX host ashar.pknic.net.pk was not resolvable. So we could not even send email about the email address being broken let alone the routing problems.
pinger@pinger $ pinger@pinger $ ping pinger.comsats.edu.pk PING pinger.comsats.edu.pk (202.83.169.113) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 202-83-169-113.reverse.ntc.net.pk (202.83.169.113): icmp_seq=0 ttl=42 time=323 ms 64 bytes from 202-83-169-113.reverse.ntc.net.pk (202.83.169.113): icmp_seq=1 ttl=42 time=323 ms --- pinger.comsats.edu.pk ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1012ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 323.113/323.116/323.120/0.568 ms, pipe 2 pinger@pinger $ traceroute pinger.comsats.edu.pk traceroute to pinger.comsats.edu.pk (202.83.169.113), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets 1 rtr-iepm-test (134.79.243.1) 0.485 ms 0.468 ms 0.368 ms 2 rtr-core1-p2p-iepm (134.79.252.5) 0.359 ms 0.325 ms 0.369 ms 3 rtr-dmz1-ger (134.79.135.15) 0.478 ms 0.429 ms 0.500 ms 4 slac-rt4.es.net (192.68.191.146) 2.112 ms 0.437 ms 0.484 ms 5 slacmr1-slacrt4.es.net (134.55.209.93) 0.615 ms 0.467 ms 0.476 ms 6 snv2mr1-slacmr1.es.net (134.55.217.2) 0.865 ms 0.827 ms 0.858 ms 7 snv2sdn1-snv2mr1.es.net (134.55.207.37) 0.864 ms 0.954 ms 1.107 ms 8 snvrt1-snv2sdn1.es.net (134.55.221.37) 2.579 ms 1.424 ms 0.975 ms 9 188.ATM1-0.BR2.SJC1.ALTER.NET (204.255.174.49) 1.492 ms 1.917 ms 1.478 ms 10 154.ATM3-0.XR1.SJC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.51.174) 2.489 ms 1.954 ms 1.991 ms 11 0.so-0-0-0.XL1.SJC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.55.114) 2.479 ms 2.444 ms 2.566 ms 12 0.so-6-0-1.XT1.NYC8.ALTER.NET (152.63.0.162) 73.500 ms 73.479 ms 73.333 ms 13 0.so-3-0-0.XR1.NYC8.ALTER.NET (152.63.19.30) 73.412 ms 73.488 ms 73.934 ms 14 183.ATM6-0.IG3.NYC8.ALTER.NET (152.63.26.49) 73.561 ms 73.921 ms 73.406 ms 15 pctl-gw.customer.alter.net (208.192.182.34) 296.974 ms 296.952 ms 296.863 ms 16 pos1-2.rwp44gsrc2.pie.net.pk (202.125.159.23) 416.967 ms 461.364 ms 537.902 ms MPLS Label=567 CoS=7 TTL=1 S=0 17 rwp44.pie.net.pk (202.125.159.210) 316.331 ms 316.336 ms 317.447 ms MPLS Label=591 CoS=7 TTL=1 S=0 18 221.120.235.166 (221.120.235.166) 325.879 ms 322.847 ms 321.939 ms 19 202-83-169-113.reverse.ntc.net.pk (202.83.169.113) 322.466 ms 327.761 ms 323.940 msLooking at the history plots from PingER it appears that the link is fragile as seen from SLAC with several periods of unreachability in the last few days.
On the other hand Azher Amin from NIIT reported that that either there was no electricity in Comsats during the downtime (Sunday) or their FO link/equipment was cutoff.
The www.pie.net.pk server was still inaccessible and the MX host for pie.net.pk was still not responding Sunday 7/8/07 10:00pm (PDT), even though pinger.comsats.edu.pk was accessible.